NEW YORK, June 15, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff.
Prothena Corporation (NASDAQ:PRTA)
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: July 16, 2018 Class Period: October 15, 2015 and April 20, 2018
The complaint alleges that Prothena issued materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: the relevant trial data showed that Prothena’s antibody NEOD001, designed to treat amyloid light chain amyloidosis (“AL amyloidosis”), was not an effective treatment; the Company made misleading comparisons of NEOD001’s “best response” rates against certain prior studies; and the Company touted Prothena’s ongoing Phase 1/2 study of NEOD001 as providing a strong basis for late-stage Phase 2b and Phase 3 studies of NEOD001, even though the full Phase 1/2 study data demonstrated that NEOD001 was not an effective treatment.
Get additional information: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-c/prothena-corporation-2?wire=3.
Fluor Corporation (NYSE:FLR)
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: July 24, 2018 Class Period: August 14, 2013 and May 3, 2018
The complaint alleges that Fluor’s bidding process for projects related to the construction of gas-fired power generation facilities was flawed; Fluor had improperly estimated the gas-fire projects; as a result, Fluor would face craft productivity issues, equipment issues and other execution issues; Fluor would incur multiple charges impacting quarterly results; and Fluor would ultimately decide to discontinue the pursuit of the gas-fired power market.
Get additional information: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-c/fluor-corporation?wire=3.
PG&E Corporation (NYSE:PCG)
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 13, 2018 Class Period: April 29, 2015, and June 8, 2018
The complaint alleges that PG&E had failed to maintain electricity transmission and distribution networks in compliance with safety requirements and regulations promulgated under state law; consequently, PG&E was in violation of state law regulation; PG&E’s electricity networks would cause numerous wildfires in California; and as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ statements about the Company’s business and operations were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.Get additional information: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-c/pge-corporation?wire=3.
Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. There is no cost or obligation to you. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email firstname.lastname@example.org, by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit the websites provided.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002